ABSTRACT
The banking sector is the
bedrock of the Nigerian economy, and this industry is known to have contributed
in no small measure to the development of the economy. This industry is the
enabling hub of national and global payment systems, which facilitates trade
transactions within and amongst numerous national, regional and international
economic units and by so doing; it enhances commerce, industry and
exchange. In performing these various functions in the enabling
environment provided by the government through various fiscal, and monetary
policies and reforms, this industry has been experiencing a phenomenal distress
whereby the banking institutions could not meet their financial obligations to
their customers and stakeholders, which led to the liquidation of many
banking institutions, lost of deposits by depositors, lost of
investments by many investors and the crisis of confidence by the general
public. Various researchers and bodies including the Central Bank of Nigeria
(CBN) and Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) have done some works to
solve this problem. The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has introduced various
reforms, yet this problem persists. The objective of this work is to evaluate
financial strategy as determinant for sustainable performance growth and an
antidote to distress in the Nigerian banking industry. The research
method is empirical, and descriptive with the use of primary and secondary data
from 1998-2007. Primary data were obtained from a sampled population through the
use of a corporate questionnaire, and for the secondary, macro data were
obtained from Central Bank and Nigerian Stock Exchange. Multivariate
Analysis of variance method (MANOVA) was applied in analyzing the primary data.
The results revealed the homogeneity, co linearity, and strong
interrelationship between the dependent variables and the independent variables
to solve distress in the three types of banks analyzed. With the results
obtained, all the five null hypotheses were nullified. Multiple regression
analysis was used to analyze the secondary data in conjunction with change in
growth model. The results from the two statistical methods revealed a
co-movement and correlation between Gross Domestic Product and Bank performance
indices in the banking industry. A change in bank performance will have the
same directional change in Gross Domestic Product as other sectors of the
economy are also affected. The Bank performance indices are strong predictors
of Gross Domestic Product. The work recommended a transformational financial
strategy model in the work for implementation in the banking industry so that
distress can be avoided and totally resolved. The model contains the following
indices: sound corporate governance, good investment policy, effective capital budgeting,
corporate planning, effective tax planning, effective budgetary control and
economic profit of investment. An implementation of the model will give birth
to sustainable performance growth which contains the following growth
variables: adequate capital, quality earning assets, stable profitability,
sustainable liquidity, enhanced dividend paid, and equitable tax liability.
Other recommendations are: effective risk assets management, sound training of
credit analyst, quality supervision from the industry regulators, and
independence of EFCC for effectiveness. However, all stakeholders must be
committed to the model and other recommendations.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter one: Introduction
1.1 Background to the
Study
1.2 Statement of the
problem
1.3 Objectives of the
study
1.4 Research
Questions
1.5 Statement of
Hypotheses
1.6 Scope of
Study
1.7 Significance of
Study
1.8 Preview of Research
Methodology
1.9 Operational Definition of
Terms
Chapter Two
Literature Review
2.1
Introduction
2.2 The Evolution of Banking in
Nigeria
2.2.1The Colonial Era
(1892-1957)
2.2.2The Independence Era
(1957-1970)
2.2.3The Indigenous Era
(1970-1985)
2.2.4 The Privatization and
Commercialization Era
(1986-1992)
2.2.5Bank Rehabilitation and
Restructuring Era
(1992-date)
2.2.6The Nature of Bank Reforms
in Nigeria
2.3 Review of Literature
relating to Financial Strategy and Sustainable
Performance
Growth
2.3.1 Competing for the
future
2.3.2 Central Bank of Nigeria
(CBN) and Nigeria Deposit Insurance
Corporation (NDIC) definition of distress and analytical
framework
2.3.3 Strategic Planning and
Sustainable Performance Growth
2.3.4 Financial Strategy in the
Banking
Industry
2.4 Review of Literature
relating to Strategic Planning and Bank
Performance for Sustainability and Growth in Nigerian Banking
Industry
2.4.1 Strategic planning:
Financial performance relations in Banks: A causal
examination
2.4.2 Corporate Governance and
Sustainable Performance
Growth
Cases of Poor Corporate Governance in Banks
1. The Rumbles in Spring
Bank
2. Development in Wema Bank Plc
3. CBN Replaces Five Bank MDs,
Directors
2.4.3 Budgetary Control and
Performance Evaluation
2.4.4 Capital Budgeting and
Sustainable Performance
Growth
2.4.5 Tax Planning and
liquidity
2.4.6 Leadership and Sustainable
Performance
Growth
2.5 Review of Literature
relating to Investment Policies and
Management of Assets and Liabilities in Nigeria Banking
Industry
2.5.1 A case study of distress
banks in Nigeria by Central Bank of
Nigeria
2.5.2 Banking crisis: causes,
early warning signals and
resolutions
2.5.3 The causes of financial
distress in local banks in Africa and
Prudential policy
2.5.4 Incentives and Resolution
of Bank
Distress
2.6 Review of Literature
relating to Bank Performance and Gross Domestic
Product to Determine their
Co-movement
2. 6.1 Economic Profit and
Performance Measurement in the Banking Industry
2.6.2 Banking practice and the
Nigerian economy
2.6.3 Micro and Macro
Determinant of bank fragility in North Cyprus
Economy
2.7 Justification of
study
2.8 Theoretical
Framework
2.9.Framework Proposal:Causal
Link between Model and Research
Work
Chapter Three
Research Methodology
3.1
Introduction
3.2 Study Area
3.3 Research
Design
3.4 Population, Sample
Representatives and Sampling
Techniques
3.5 Performance
Indices
3.6 Restatement of
Hypotheses
3.7 Data Collection
Techniques
3.8 Reliability and Validity
Test
3.9 Data
Administration
3.10 Method of Data
Analysis
3.11 Expected
Results
3.13
Chapterization
Chapter Four
Analysis and Interpretation of Data
4.1
Introduction
4.2.Response to Questionnaire
4.3 Frequency Analysis of
response to Questionnaire
items
4.3.1 Section1 Relationship
between Financial strategy and Sustainable
Performance
4.3.2 Section2 Relationship
between Strategic Planning and Performance
For Sustainability of Growth of
Business
4.3.3 Section 3Assessment of
Investment Policy for Better Management of
Assets and Liabilities in
banks
4.3.4 Section 4Evaluation of
Relationship between Bank Performance and Gross
Domestic Product
(GDP)
4:4 Descriptive Analysis of
response to Questionnaire
items
4.4.1Evaluation of the
relationship between Financial Strategy and Sustainable
Performance Growth
4.4.2 Evaluation of the
relationship between Strategic Planning and Performance
For Sustainability of Business
Growth
4.4.3 Assessment of the
relationship Investment Policy and Management of Assets
and Liabilities for Sustainable Performance Growth in the Banking Industry
4.4.4 Evaluating the
relationship between Bank Performance and GDP
4.5.0 Statistical Testing
Model
4.5.1 Testing of
Hypothesis
1
4.5.2 Testing of
Hypothesis
2
4.5.3 Testing of
Hypothesis
3
4.5.4 Testing of
Hypothesis
4
4.5.5 Testing of
Hypothesis
5
4.6 Analysis of
Secondary
Data
4.6.1 Multiple
Regression
4.6.2 Analysis and Comparison
of Growth Change in GDP and Bank
Performance
Indices
Chapter Five
Summary of Findings, Conclusion and
Recommendations
5.1 Research Findings:
Empirical
Findings
5.2
Conclusion
5.3
Recommendations
5.4 Suggestions for Further
Studies
5.5 Contribution to
knowledge
References
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
In the ordinary parlance, the word distress connotes unhealthy
situation or state of inability or weakness which prevents the achievement of a
set goals and aspirations. A financial institution will be described as
unhealthy; when it exhibits severe financial, operational and managerial
weaknesses where sustainability and stability are missing in business. A
business is any activity that seeks to make profit by providing goods and
services to the society by using inputs from the environment and transform them
into outputs that add meaning to human existence. A business can be one’s
regular employment, profession, occupation and can be an organization
established through the pooling together of resources by various investors with
the aim of providing products or services to the economy, contribute to the
development of the economy and earn returns on their investments. Nigerian
businesses can be classified into three major segments viz: Private
enterprises, Private limited Liability Companies and publicly quoted
companies. The banking sector belongs to the private limited liability
companies and the publicly quoted companies. While some banking institutions
are privately owned by investors, some are publicly quoted on the Nigerian
Stock Exchange. The banking sector is part of Nigerian financial system, and
financial system refers to the totality of the regulatory and participating
institutions, including financial markets and instruments, involved in the
process of financial intermediation. The major objectives of investing in the
banking sector are to provide financial services to the economy and earn
compensatory returns on capital employed.
The Bills of Exchange Acts Cap
21, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1958 states that a ‘banker’ includes a body
of persons whether incorporated or not who carry on the business of banking. By
S.2 Coins Act Cap 34, laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1958, bank and banker
mean any persons, partnerships or company carrying on the business of bankers
and also any saving bank established under the Saving Bank Ordinance, and also
any banking company incorporated under any ordinance heretofore or hereafter
passed relating to such incorporation. S.21 (1) Nigerian Evidence Act, Cap.62,
laws of Federation of Nigeria, 1958, also provides in like manner. (Olulana,
1999:16). The Banks and other Financial Institutions Act No 25 of 1991 defines
bank as one licensed under the Act and banking business as the business of
receiving deposits on current, saving or other similar account, and paying or
collecting cheques-S.62 BOFIA. The industry is the enabling hub of national and
global payments system by facilitating trade transactions within
and amongst numerous national, regional and international economic units and by
so doing; it enhances commerce, industry and exchange. The banking industry in
Nigeria is the bedrock of the economy.
According to Onoh
(2002:10-13),the establishment of modern banking in Nigeria dates back to the
colonial era when the African Banking Corporation was formed in 1892 to
distribute currency notes of the Bank of England for the British treasury.
Subsequent developments were encouraged by colonial entrepreneurs who needed
banking institutions to back up the colonial trade. In the bid to address the
credit needs of indigenous entrepreneurs, Nigerians later ventured into the
banking business, initially through private individuals and later through
deliberate government policy. According to CBN and NDIC (1995:1), the problem
of distress in the financial sector, including bank failure, has been observed
in Nigeria as far back as 1930 when the first bank failure was reported.
Between 1930 and 1958 when Central Bank of Nigeria CBN was established, about
22 banks were liquidated (appendix 1). In 1992, 3banks were liquidated while in
1994, 4banks were liquidated. The degree of intensity and scope of the distress
has never been as serious as has been observed since June,1989 when the
Government directive to withdraw deposits of government and other public sector
institutions from banks to the CBN exposed the weak financial condition of most
financial institutions. This led to the increase in the number of distressed
institutions and the severity of the problem has been on the increase. The
intensity of the problem led to the liquidation of 26banks in 1998(appendix 2).
According to CBN
(2004:1), following the deregulation of the Nigerian financial sector in 1986
during era of structural adjustment programme (SAP), the banking industry
witnessed remarkable growth, both in the number of deposit money banks and
other types of financial institutions. However, in the early 1990s, Nigerian
banking institutions faced many challenges, including increased competition and
harsh economic conditions. Against this background, the incidence of financial
sector distress induced by undercapitalization, liquidity crisis and high
degree of non-performing loans characterized the banking industry in Nigeria.
Some of the banks were faced with the threat of liquidation, while some were
resuscitated as a result of the timely intervention of the regulatory
authorities.
Several measures have been
taken by the supervisory agencies to tackle the problem of distress in the
financial system most especially the banking industry to stem the deterioration
in the financial conditions of ailing banks with the ultimate aim of restoring
confidence in the financial system. These varied from financial assistance,
imposition of holding actions and supervisory intervention to the outright
liquidation of some distressed banks. As a way of minimizing the distress in
the banking system, the Central Bank in 1990 introduced the Prudential
Guidelines on early recognition of loan losses and required banks to make
adequate provisions for bad and doubtful debts, a factor which was responsible
for the insolvency of some banks.
The Central Bank of
Nigeria explained that based on bank examination reports, the supervisory
authorities drew the attention of the Boards and Managements of distressed
banks to a number of shortcomings such as poor credit policy, large portfolio
of non-performing assets, weak internal controls, insider abuses. All the
recommendations were unheeded. The regulatory authorities had to impose holding
actions on such banks, the implementation of which was time bound. The
CBN in collaboration with the NDIC granted liquidity support to illiquid banks
to assist them meet their obligations as and when due. This helped to achieve
some measure of success and restore public confidence. Technical assistance was
provided by the supervisory agencies in form of advisory services and
secondment of staff when the need arose. Owing to limited success in the
application of Holding Actions, the CBN assumed control and management of some
distressed banks with the intention to acquire, restructure and subsequently
sell them to the public. In order to sanitize the banking system and install
market discipline, the licences of some banks were revoked in the system in
1992, 1994, 1998 and 2005.
According to Eghodaghe (1993) and
cited by CBN/NDIC (1995), a financial institution in distress is usually one
where the evaluation depicts poor condition in all or most of the five
performance factors as follows:
(a) Gross undercapitalization
in relation to level of operation;
(b) High level of classified
loans and advances;
(c) Illiquidity reflected in
the inability to meet customers’ cash withdrawals;
(d) Low earnings resulting from
huge operational losses, and
(e) Weak management as
reflected by poor credit quality, inadequate internal controls, high rate of
frauds and forgeries, labour turn-over, etc.
Based on the extent and depth
of the problem, it is evident that Nigeria has been experiencing generalized
type of distress. The generalized type of distress exists when its occurrence
is spreading so fast and cut across all the sub-sectors of the industry but its
depth, in terms of the ratio of total deposits of distressed institutions to
total deposits of the industry; the ratio of total assets of distressed
institutions to total assets of the industry; and the ratio of total branches
of distressed institutions to total institutional branches of the industry;
among others, has not adversely affected the confidence of the public in the
financial system. This situation arose because of the highhandedness of the
Board of Directors and Management of the various institutions. The Managing
Directors and Chief Executive Officers of these banks had influencing and
controlling power over operational issues which have breached the tenets of corporate
governance. The four pillars of corporate governance of Accountability,
Fairness, Transparency and Independence have been thrown into the dustbin.
Non-compliance with monetary and fiscal policies and regulatory
authorities principles and regulations have resulted into abuse of power, lack
of initiative to put in place good credit policies that will aid assets and
liabilities management. Fraud and malpractices and poor lending habit have been
introduced into the system despite all the efforts of the regulatory
authorities to sanitize the system. Despite the growth in business
and volume of assets of these institutions, rather than performance growth
sustainability, what is prevailing is performance deterioration and financial
distress. The performance growth indices could not be sustained. The banking
institutions failed to design on their own strategies that will bring
sustainability and stability into the system like developing
strategies that critically measure and analyze performance indices of capital,
assets quality,profitability,liquidity,didvidend paid and tax paid. In 2005
December, when the Central Bank of Nigeria concluded the consolidation exercise
in the industry for a new reform and transformation, only the following banks
had the financial capacity to meet the minimum capital base of N25billion: First Bank Plc, Union Bank Plc,
Zenith Bank Plc, Oceanic Bank Plc and Citibank Ltd. Others went into mergers
and Acquisition options which eventually produced 25megabanks in the
industry. Fourteen (14) banks whose balance sheet did not possess any
value for merger or acquisition were liquidated (appendix 3).
According to Masi, (1981)
cited in Agene, (1995: 56) “On the day of independence the financial system was
underdeveloped and most of the complex ramifications which are integral to it
today were not there. The Central Bank was only established two years before
independence and up to that date, there was little or no regulation of the
banking industry. Fiscal policy in colonial Nigeria was frankly rudimentary as
most of the banks were foreign-owned and foreign managed, and their orientation
was essentially foreign. He further explained that the two decades
preceding the country’s independence were therefore, a period of tremendous growth
and development in this crucial sector of Nigeria economy. The Nigeria banking
system may therefore be conceived as a network of monetary financial
institutions which act together as a repository for the community’s wealth; the
interbank financial markets i.e. foreign exchange and money markets, which
provide a web of debt instruments; and the framework of laws and regulations
which control the flow of money and credit in time and space.
Department | Education |
Project ID Code | EDU0281 |
Chapters | 5 Chapters |
No of Pages | 58 pages |
Reference | YES |
Format | Microsoft Word |
Price | ₦4000, $15 |
|
|
Contact Us On | +2347043069458 |